Securing Higher Grades Costing Your Pocket? Book Your Assignment at The Lowest Price Now!


Get assignment help service to meet the high expectations of your professors

GET ASSIGNMENT HELP

SBM4202 IS Strategy, Management and Acquisition Assignment

Unit Code and Title: SBM4202 IS Strategy, Management & Acquisition 
Asia Pacific International College      

Assessment Overview

Assessment Details:

In this assessment students are required to write a report on a topic, given below. These topics are related to IS strategy, Management, Organization and Technology. Choose a topic from the list below please:

  1. The IS strategies and evidences for gaining competitive advantage through technology and acquisition

OR

  1. The impact of artificial intelligence on decision support system. OR
  2. The impact of IS strategy on organizational performance.

Students are advised to do their own research on the topic selected, and make a report which will cover the followings

  • Introduction
  • Discussion of the core concepts
  • Critical analysis of the impact of it (i.e. strategies/artificial intelligence/IS strategy) on (acquisition/decision support/organizational performance)
  • Examples and evidences to support the arguments
  • Conclusion

Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark

Marking

Criteria

Not satisfactory

(0-49%) of the criterion mark

Satisfactory

(50-64%) of the criterion mark

Good

(65-74%) of the criterion mark

Very Good

(75-84%) of the criterion mark

Excellent

(85-100%) of the criterion mark

Introduction

General discussion

Topic chosen

(10 marks)

Poor Introduction with irrelevant details

Introduction is presented briefly with some relevance and missing elements such as company background/report outline

Introduction is generally presented in good fashion, however missing one element such as company background/

report outline

Introduction is well written with clear discussion about company background/

report outline

Introduction is very well written with very clear background, discussion about company background/

report outline

Discussion of the core concepts

(20 marks)

Lack of evidence of adequate understanding of the topic selected

Evidence of unsatisfactory knowledge and understanding of the topic selected

Has given a factual and/or conceptual knowledge and understanding of the topic selected

Reasonable level of knowledge and understanding of the topic selected

Has excellent knowledge and understanding of the topic selected

Critical analysis on the impact

(20 marks)

Lack of evidence of adequate critical analysis of the topic selected

Evidence of unsatisfactory critical analysis of the topic selected

Has given a factual critical analysis of the topic selected

Reasonable level of critical analysis of the topic selected

Has excellent critical analysis of the topic selected

Examples and evidences to support the arguments (20 marks)

Lack of examples and evidences to support the logical arguments

Evidence of unsatisfactory examples and evidences to support the logical arguments

Has given a factual examples and evidences to support the logical arguments

Reasonable examples and evidences to support the logical arguments

Has excellent examples and evidences to support the logical arguments

Conclusion of the

Report

(5 marks)

Lack of evidence of the conclusion of the report

Evidence of unsatisfactory conclusion of the report

Has given a factual conclusion of the report

Reasonable conclusion of the report

Has excellent conclusion of the report

Report organization

How logically arguments are

stated and how

critically problems are analysed.

(15 marks)

Does not clearly state a conclusion or point of view or else little or no supporting reasoning or evidence is presented. Problem situation is not critically analysed

States a conclusion or point of view but does not organize the evidence or reasons in a logically adequate way. Analysis of the problem situation is not that satisfactory

States a conclusion or point of view but expected to be organized more

logically. Analysis of the problem situation is so far reasonable.

Presents an argument using evidence and /or logical reasoning in support of a point of view. Problem situation is analysed with satisfactory level of critical analysis skills

Develops a clearly articulated argument, using evidence and/or systematic logical reasoning in support of a conclusion or point of view. The way problem situation is analysed requires high

level of critical analysis skills

References and citation

(10 marks)

Lacks consistency with many errors.

Unclear referencing/style

Generally good referencing/style

Clear referencing/ style

Clear styles with appropriate referencing and citation, apply Harvard referencing style

Assignment Help Features
Assignment Help Services
  • Assignment Help
  • Homework Help
  • Writing Help
  • Academic Writing Assistance
  • Editing Services
  • Plagiarism Checker Online
  • Proofreading
  • Research Writing Help
QR Code Assignment Help
elearningfeeds