ACCY200 Assessment Task 3

Grade Awarded

Demonstrates

Excellent (Mark range: 8.5 – 10)

Clearlyidentifies one or two impacts COVID19 economic restrictions have specifically on the application of the accounting standard Logically and coherentlyexplains the identified impact(s)

Discusses the impact(s) within the accounting context

Discusses specific parts of the accounting standard that are relevant

Informed discussion - well researched and cites references

Displays academic writing style, clear expression, effective use of paragraphs, correct spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence construction

Applies Harvard Referencing Method in the content and in reference list

Manages response within the limits set for length, style and format.

Good (Mark range: 7 – 8)

Clearlyidentifies one or two impacts COVID19 economic restrictions have specifically on the application of the accounting standard 

Explains the identified impact(s) 

Discusses the impact(s) broadly with less emphasis on accounting

Discusses the accounting standard generally; or, specifically but may not reveal a full understanding

Informed discussion – some research evident with occasional citing of references

Displays academic writing style, with one or two areas (clear expression, use of paragraphs, spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence construction) needing further development

Applies Harvard Referencing Method in the content and in reference list

Manages response within most (or all) of the limits set for length, style and format.

Satisfactory (Mark range: 5 – 6.5)

Discusses the impacts COVID19 economic restrictions have generally on the application of the accounting standard; and/or does not offer a clear identification of one or two impacts for the application of the standard; and/or too much discussion is on the impacts of the economic restrictions on entities in general

Displays some problems with logic and coherency in explanation

Discusses some of the impact within the accounting context

Discusses generally the accounting standard but may not connect this logically to application issues caused by the restrictions

Lacks Informed discussion – one or two references are cited; and/or the references are not used logically to make a clear point

Grade Awarded

Demonstrates

Displays a writing style that needs further development of a few areas in: academic style, expression, use of paragraphs, spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence construction.

Applies referencing method that does not correctly adhere to Harvard Referencing Method

Manages response within some (or all) of the limits set for length, style and format.

Fair (Mark range: 4 – 4.5)

Discusses COVID19 economic restrictions and impact on entities, identifies the accounting standard, but has not successfully made the link between the two.

Displays problems with logic and coherency in explanation, with minor parts offering some meaning.

Discusses some of the impact within the accounting context

Lacks Informed discussion – one or two references are cited; and/or the references are not used logically to make a clear point

Displays a writing style that makes readability difficult in some or many parts. Further development needed in most areas of academic style, expression, use of paragraphs, spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence construction.

Problems in applying a method of referencing: does not correctly adhere to Harvard Referencing Method or any method, and/or poorly referenced content where referencing should have been applied.

Manages response without much consideration of set limits, or some of the limits set for length, style and format are met.

Unsatisfactory (Mark range: 0 – 3.5) 

Discusses very little of COVID19 economic restrictions and does not apply this to the impact on entities; may also fail to identify the accounting standard.

Displays mostly confusion and misunderstanding of the impact on the application of standard; and problems with logic and coherency in explanation.

Discusses mostly (or entirely) without attention to accounting context

Lacks Informed discussion – one or two references are cited but with no clear/logical point.

Displays a writing style that makes readability difficult in most parts. Further development needed in all areas of academic style, expression, use of paragraphs, spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence construction.

Problems in applying a method of referencing: does not correctly adhere to Harvard Referencing Method or any method, and/or poorly referenced content where referencing should have been applied.

Manages response without consideration of set limits (eg, too short in length, incorrect formatting)